Implementation research

From Glossary for Health Technology Lifecycle by EuroScan
Revision as of 15:03, 6 February 2025 by Admin1 (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Implementation Research for Health Technologies

"Implementation research is the scientific study of methods to promote the systematic uptake of research findings and other evidence-based practices into routine practice, and, hence, to improve the quality and effectiveness of health services and care." (1)


Implementation research (IR) plays a critical role in bridging the gap between health technology development and real-world application. It focuses on understanding and overcoming barriers to the adoption, integration, and scaling of health technologies within healthcare systems.

The World Health Organisation has developed specific toolkits to support implementation research in the area of tobacco prevention. (2)

In some areas of the world implementation studies had been misused and by this do have still a bad reputation. Therefore it is important, that standards in reporting results (3) and registration in relevant study databases (e.g WHO study database) (4) are necessary to validate the added value of health interventions in reality.

Key Objectives of Implementation Research

- Identify barriers and facilitators to the adoption of health technologies.

- Develop strategies for integrating innovations into healthcare workflows.

- Assess the effectiveness, acceptability, and sustainability of health technologies in different contexts.

- Inform policy and decision-making for scalable implementation.

Core Components of Implementation Research

1. Stakeholder Engagement: Involves healthcare providers, patients, policymakers, and industry to ensure practical relevance.

2. Context Analysis: Examines the healthcare setting, regulatory framework, and socio-economic factors influencing implementation.

3. Implementation Strategies: Develops tailored approaches, such as training programs, policy adaptations, and incentives.

4. Evaluation Frameworks: Uses qualitative and quantitative methods to assess adoption, feasibility, and outcomes.

5. Knowledge Translation: Ensures research findings are effectively communicated to decision-makers and practitioners.

Methods and Approaches

- Mixed-Methods Research: Combines qualitative (interviews, focus groups) and quantitative (surveys, trials) data.

- Real-World Evidence Generation: Uses pilot studies and case studies for practical insights.

- Implementation Science Models: Applies frameworks such as RE-AIM (5), CFIR, and the PDSA cycle to guide systematic implementation (6).

Challenges and Considerations

- Regulatory and Ethical Issues: Compliance with local and international health regulations.

- Scalability and Sustainability: Ensuring long-term adoption beyond initial pilot phases.

- Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Balancing innovation benefits with healthcare budget constraints.

Summary

Implementation research is essential for ensuring that health technologies are effectively adopted and integrated into healthcare systems. By focusing on real-world challenges and solutions, IR enhances the impact of innovations, ultimately improving patient outcomes and healthcare efficiency. IR is more and more related to the bridge around the world (8)

Literature:

  1. Eccles, M.P., Mittman, B.S. Welcome to Implementation Science . Implementation Sci 1, 1 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-1-1
  2. WHO Team - Special Programme for TDR SCIImplementation research toolkit: Facilitator's guide. ISBN: 978 92 4 150696 0. https://fctc.who.int/resources/publications/i/item/2014-04-01-implementation-research-toolkit
  3. Pinnock H, Barwick M, Carpenter CR, Eldridge S, Grandes G, Griffiths CJ, Rycroft-Malone J, Meissner P, Murray E, Patel A, Sheikh A, Taylor SJ; StaRI Group. Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI) Statement. BMJ. 2017 Mar 6;356:i6795. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i6795. PMID: 28264797; PMCID: PMC5421438.
  4. WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) https://www.who.int/clinical-trials-registry-platform
  5. Boersma, P., J. C. M.van Weert (2023). RE-AIM Implementation Framework. In The International Encyclopedia of Health Communication (eds E. Y. Ho, C. L. Bylund, J. C. M. van Weert, I. Basnyat, N. Bol and M. Dean). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119678816.iehc0945
  6. Damschroder, L.J., Reardon, C.M., Widerquist, M.A.O. et al. The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research based on user feedback. Implementation Sci 17, 75 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-022-01245-0
  7. Taylor MJ, McNicholas C, Nicolay C, Darzi A, Bell D, Reed JE. Systematic review of the application of the plan-do-study-act method to improve quality in healthcare. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Apr;23(4):290-8. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-001862. Epub 2013 Sep 11. PMID: 24025320; PMCID: PMC3963536.
  8. Nnaji CA, Wiysonge CS, Okeibunor J, Malinga T, Adamu AA, Tumusiime P, Karamagi H. Protocol for a scoping review of implementation research approaches to universal health coverage in Africa. BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 15;11(2):e041721. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041721. PMID: 33589452; PMCID: PMC7887369.
Retrieved from "http://glossary.i-hts.org/index.php?title=Implementation_research&oldid=892"